Notice how the Guardian moderators tolerate off-topic support for BDS in its comment threads by no less than a Guardian writer.
This example is from the Vile Miles thread from last week:
But wait, as is always the case, it gets better. An attempt to refute savvymum’s calls for a Jewish boycott (because that is what it is) elicits this deletion no doubt for quoting from the Hamas Charter:
Before…
After…
Now granted if bluejewel’s comment is deemed off-topic why not delete savvymum’s comment too?
And if there was at all any doubt that permitting the promotion of BDS was a mere oversight, we have these undeleted comments:
COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING AND ANALYSIS
Promoting BDS in the Comment Threads
Notice how the Guardian moderators tolerate off-topic support for BDS in its comment threads by no less than a Guardian writer.
This example is from the Vile Miles thread from last week:
But wait, as is always the case, it gets better. An attempt to refute savvymum’s calls for a Jewish boycott (because that is what it is) elicits this deletion no doubt for quoting from the Hamas Charter:
Before…
After…
Now granted if bluejewel’s comment is deemed off-topic why not delete savvymum’s comment too?
And if there was at all any doubt that permitting the promotion of BDS was a mere oversight, we have these undeleted comments:
The Love Boat
You may also like
Daniel Levy’s CiF essay on Jewish voters’ concerns with US Israel policy cites influence of Jews’ media megaphone
CiF Watch Exclusive: Guardian Forced to Premoderate Antisemitic Thread
It's easier to conclude racism without all the facts