Mya Guarnieri had an exchange in the comment section of her shameful CiF piece, “Israeli racist rabbis decree strike at the heart of Judaism” really worth noting. While CiF Watch dissected Guarnieri’s invectives against Israel here, a commenter also effectively challenged Guarnieri’s assertions that the racist edicts in question were “state-sanctioned.”
And, now, Guarneri’s reply:
Just to recap: Mya Guarnieri engages in an utterly sophomoric rant which accuses the Jewish state of descending into fascism, a contention which largely depends on her assertion that the bigoted edict in question was state sanctioned, and, upon being presented with the fact that the Prime Minster, President, and government ministers emphatically condemned the act, defends herself by complaining that she couldn’t possibly “report on every aspect of the story.”
Yes, Mya, as you noted, you’re “not reporting on the issue.” You’re clearly only reporting on the aspects which support your pre-established anti-Zionist conclusions.
Like this:
Like Loading...
COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING AND ANALYSIS
CiF’s Mya Guarnieri tells it like it is: “I’m not reporting on the issue.”
Mya Guarnieri had an exchange in the comment section of her shameful CiF piece, “Israeli racist rabbis decree strike at the heart of Judaism” really worth noting. While CiF Watch dissected Guarnieri’s invectives against Israel here, a commenter also effectively challenged Guarnieri’s assertions that the racist edicts in question were “state-sanctioned.”
And, now, Guarneri’s reply:
Just to recap: Mya Guarnieri engages in an utterly sophomoric rant which accuses the Jewish state of descending into fascism, a contention which largely depends on her assertion that the bigoted edict in question was state sanctioned, and, upon being presented with the fact that the Prime Minster, President, and government ministers emphatically condemned the act, defends herself by complaining that she couldn’t possibly “report on every aspect of the story.”
Yes, Mya, as you noted, you’re “not reporting on the issue.” You’re clearly only reporting on the aspects which support your pre-established anti-Zionist conclusions.
Like this:
Guardian editor defends Hamas's right to kill Israelis, AGAIN.
You may also like
Israeli Apartheid Week: The shame of UK students
Labour MP & anti-Israel activist accuse British Ambassador of greater loyalty to Israel than the UK
“Abu Nidal, Abu Shmidal”: Guardian Mid-East editor misleads on roots of ’82 Lebanon War