I noted that Hasan is on record referring to atheists who don’t believe in Islam as immoral, lacking intelligence, and similar to “cattle”.
Prior to my CW post, I made a similar point beneath the line in Hasan’s CiF commentary.
CLICK TO ENLARGE
My comment eventually garnered more than 40 recommends before it was deemed inconsistent with Guardian “community standards”.
My comment wasn’t in any way ad hominem, and merely noted Hasan’s own words to demonstrate that he has absolutely no credibility when it comes to condemning intolerance. When you refer to non-believers as “cattle” you do more than merely demonize them, you suggest that they are subhuman.
So, please tell me, what possible justification was there for CiF moderators to delete my comment?
This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience.
%d
Privacy settings
Privacy Settings
This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit.
NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.
Comment is Free moderators delete my comment pointing out the moral hypocrisy of Medhi Hasan
In a recent CiF Watch post I demonstrated the hypocrisy of New Statesman senior editor Medhi Hasan who, in a recent CiF piece, “How the fear of being criminalised has forced Muslims into silence“, Sept. 8, sanctimoniously condemned post 9/11 bigotry against Muslims.
I noted that Hasan is on record referring to atheists who don’t believe in Islam as immoral, lacking intelligence, and similar to “cattle”.
Prior to my CW post, I made a similar point beneath the line in Hasan’s CiF commentary.
My comment eventually garnered more than 40 recommends before it was deemed inconsistent with Guardian “community standards”.
My comment wasn’t in any way ad hominem, and merely noted Hasan’s own words to demonstrate that he has absolutely no credibility when it comes to condemning intolerance. When you refer to non-believers as “cattle” you do more than merely demonize them, you suggest that they are subhuman.
So, please tell me, what possible justification was there for CiF moderators to delete my comment?
Related articles
Like this:
Economist corrects article alleging ’40 year US policy’ that settlements are “illegal”
You may also like
Guardian readers' editor claims that Hamas 'denies' using human shields
‘Pillar of Defense’ Update: 3 Israelis killed by rocket attack in city of Kiryat Malachi
The Guardian’s Paul Lewis & London Riots: 13 stories, 12,000 words, & only 1 ethnicity mentioned