Why doesn’t the Guardian’s hate crime coverage mention Christian victims?

In the Guardian mentality, you cannot carry a story of an ex-muslim persecuted for his apostasy for fear of inspiring hate against muslims. Thus a genuine case of hate crime is ignored on the grounds it could lead to other, imagined hate crimes.

In a recent article in The Spectator, Ross Clark asked a very good question: why has the Guardian ignored hate crimes against Nissar Hussain, a former Muslim from Bradford who converted to Christianity and has been the victim of constant threats and attacks over the past few years.

[Hussain] has already had to move house once. Last November, he was attacked in the street by louts who left him with a broken kneecap and a fractured forearm. Last Thursday, police had to move him to a safe house outside Yorkshire.

That someone in Britain can be subjected to a hate campaign, over so many years and by different people, based purely on their choice of religion is shocking. But not apparently newsworthy enough to qualify for coverage in the Guardian. Neither does the BBC appear to consider Nissar Hussain’s case to be newsworthy – you had to read the Mail, the Telegraph or the Mirror to find out about it.

In the Guardian mentality, you cannot carry a story of an ex-muslim persecuted for his apostasy for fear of inspiring hate against muslims.  Thus a genuine case of hate crime is ignored on the grounds it could lead to other, imagined hate crimes.

Read the rest of the article, here.

Written By
More from Adam Levick
Peter Beaumont in Gaza: 20 articles, 18,800 words & not one report on Hamas human shields
The Guardian’s Jerusalem correspondent Peter Beaumont was interviewed by Anshel Pfeffer of...
Read More
0 replies on “Why doesn’t the Guardian’s hate crime coverage mention Christian victims?”