How many falsehoods did BBC ‘Dateline London’ viewers hear in 13 minutes?

Once again 'Dateline London' fails to meet the BBC's public purposes.

The BBC’s charter sets out the five public purposes to which it is obliged to adhere with the first one being: [emphasis added]

“To provide impartial news and information to help people understand and engage with the world around them

The BBC should provide duly accurate and impartial news, current affairs and factual programming to build people’s understanding of all parts of the United Kingdom and of the wider world. Its content should be provided to the highest editorial standards. It should offer a range and depth of analysis and content not widely available from other United Kingdom news providers, using the highest calibre presenters and journalists, and championing freedom of expression, so that all audiences can engage fully with major local, regional, national, United Kingdom and global issues and participate in the democratic process, at all levels, as active and informed citizens.”

Readers can judge for themselves to what extent “people’s understanding” was enhanced by statements made by some of the participants in the April 13th edition of the programme ‘Dateline London’ (aired on the BBC News channel and the BBC World News channel) during a discussion (from 13:26 here) about the outcome of the general election in Israel.

‘Dateline London’ regular Abdel Bari Atwan told viewers that:

The US president worked for Binyamin Netanyahu as campaign director – obviously not true.

Netanyahu is “creating an apartheid state” and “establishing” an “apartheid state in Israel” – Israeli citizens enjoy equal rights and Israel is not an ‘apartheid state’.

Israel’s Nation State law states that “anybody who is non-Jew, he wouldn’t have a place in this state” – the Nation State law says nothing of the sort.

Netanyahu “said Israel is a state of the Jews. Non-Jews they are not actually citizens of this state” – that is false.

Netanyahu is “going to annex the West Bank” – Netanyahu did not say that. He did say (days before the election) that he was considering applying Israeli law to Israeli communities in Judea & Samaria.

Israel has “300 nuclear warheads” – that of course is pure speculation.

Israel has the “fourth biggest army on earth” – the fourth biggest army belongs to North Korea. Israel is in 29th place.

Palestinians don’t have the support of the international community – it is of course enough to look at the UN’s record on Israel to refute that claim.

Netanyahu is “re-stabilising, recreating, re-encouraging radicalism in the Arab world” – Atwan mentioned Algeria, Sudan and Yemen before making that claim. None of those uprisings have anything to do with Israel.

Times journalist Iain Martin claimed that Netanyahu’s re-election is a “tragedy” and no less than a “potential geo-strategic catastrophe”.

Italian filmmaker and journalist Annalisa Piras claimed that:

Israel has a “prime minister who’s going to be indicted in the next few months” – no: Netanyahu may be indicted in the next few months but that decision has not yet been made because it depends on hearings that have yet to take place.

The Oslo peace accord “would create a two-state solution” – the Oslo Accords in fact do not mention the two-state solution.

Programme presenter Carrie Gracie did very little indeed to relieve viewers of the inaccurate impressions created by those statements and others from members of her panel. It is of course worth remembering that – in relation to the same programme – the BBC has in the past claimed that the promotion of such unchallenged falsehoods is part of “a legitimate debate”.

More from Hadar Sela
BBC News coverage of terrorism in Israel in May 2015
Throughout the month of May the BBC News website’s reporting on terror...
Read More
Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Leave a comment
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.