Amnesty’s ‘woke’ racism, part 2: How Palestinians can promote peace

Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

In a Times of Israel post published earlier in the week, we argued that, in addition to the countless factual errors in Amnesty International’s report accusing Israel of ‘apartheid’, the NGO’s failure to even note decisions by Palestinian leaders that have perpetuated the conflict demonstrates that what they’re engaged in is not neutral ‘human rights’ advocacy, but anti-Israel advocacy.

The denial of agency to Palestinians was, we argued, evident in the report’s erasure of the wars and terror – and the Palestinian leadership’s repeated rejection of peace offers – which significantly contributed to the current territorial, political and security situation.

The erasure of Palestinian responsibility and agency – be it in the ‘human rights’ community or the mainstream media – not only grossly distorts our understanding of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but also represents what’s been referred to as “the bigotry of low expectations” or, within another political context, “Woke Racism”.  Both of these represent ways of describing the refusal to expect minorities, or any group deemed oppressed or disadvantaged, to meet the same standards of moral behaviour set for most people.

This isn’t to deny that such groups face real discrimination, only that they, like all individuals, have choices, and to judge their behavior by lower standards than we judge others denies their very humanity – racism in its most basic form.

So, what can Palestinians – and, especially, Palestinian leaders – do to contribute to peace and end the occupation? The sad fact is that this question is rarely even asked.

So, whilst the list below isn’t an exhaustive one, it represents a crucial paradigm by which to view, and judge commentary about, Palestinians and the choices they make.

These ideas also serve as a corrective to the historical amnesia which frames Israeli skepticism over Palestinian intentions – based on the trauma of the 2nd Intifada, frustration over the PA’s rejection of peace offers and the Palestinian culture of incitement – as Israeli intransigence, the society’s ‘move right’ or increased racism.

  1. The Palestinian Authority can hold elections for the first time in 16 years.
  2. Palestinians can advocate for such elections to be held.
  3. The Palestinian Authority can begin the process of building transparent democratic institutions, and a healthy civil society, in preparation for statehood.
  4. Palestinians can advocate for this process to begin.
  5. The Palestinians Authority can cease promoting and incentivising terrorism.
  6. Palestinians can advocate for the PA to cease such toxic propaganda.
  7. The Palestinian Authority can cease promoting antisemitism.
  8. Palestinians can reject antisemitism.
  9. The Palestinian Authority can announce they’re open to peace talks with Israel without pre-conditions.
  10. Palestinians can advocate for the PA to make such an announcement.
  11. The Palestinian Authority can encourage co-existence projects with Israelis
  12. Palestinians can volunteer to participate in such projects.
  13. Palestinians, of all stripes, can reject Hamas and all such groups which represent an immutable obstacle to peace.

There are of course many things Israelis, and Israel’s government, can do to promote peace. But, as the current discourse (particularly within the media and NGO world) already focuses almost entirely on what Israel should do, it’s important for those who see Palestinians as moral actors to incentivise them to make decisions most likely to lead to peace and an end to the occupation.

Related Posts
Written By
More from Adam Levick
Guardian's photo choice again illustrates their obsession with Israel
Even by the standards of the Guardian Left, George Monbiot represents an...
Read More
Join the Conversation

2 Comments

  1. says: Neil C

    As demonstrated everyday by the ‘woke’ BBC’s reporting by omission of ‘Palestinian’ life under ‘Palestinian rule’ is totally ignored by the world’s media. This of course leads to the bias and thus myth and legend that permeates society about the reality of life under the so called ‘occupation’ yet never a word is uttered about the occupation and renaming of Judea and Samaria by the Jordanians in 1948 who in the process demolished 43 synagogues and hundreds of Jewish homes, let alone hundreds of Jews who were slaughtered. Eventually in 1947 Israel was formed in the historic but barren homeland eventually settling for a mere 23% of the land agreed in 1920 at the San Remo Resolution by the League of Nations. It is therefore remarkable that new Israel society is as vibrant and technologically advanced as it is, despite constant attacks from Arab armies and individual Palestinian terrorists ever since. If Palestine was ever a genuine entity it would have been mentioned in the 1947 Partition Plan. The reason it wasn’t mentioned was because in 1947, a Palestinian was always Jewish it was only in 1964 when an Egyptian called Yasser Arafat hijacked the term when he formed the terrorist group the P.L.O. that Palestinians transformed into Muslim and Christian Arabs

  2. says: Frank Adam

    One of the big levers for peace is the forthcoming end of the fossil fuel era. Without petro -dollars the slush funds financing “Palestinians” and other Arab gangsters in: Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen at the expense of: Berbers, Yazidis, Chriatians and Bahai besides the Jews of Israel who are 50% ex-Arab subjects, will be depleted. Also their political leverage out of the need for oil fuels to keep the Western economies going without falling to “Communists” will also evaporate.

Leave a comment
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.