Indy corrects headline stating, as fact, that Israel killed Al Jazeera journalist

Earlier today, we complained to the Independent about the following headline, which states, as a fact, unverified claims that IDF soldiers killed Al-Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh during clashes with Palestinian terrorists this morning in Jenin.

In contrast, the Guardian, for instance, was far more careful, publishing an article on the incident with the following headline: “Al Jazeera accuses Israeli forces of killing journalist in West Bank”.

As we noted to Indy editors in our complaint, their headline wasn’t supported by the article itself, which noted only that the Qatari-owned Al Jazeera and (initially) the Palestinian Authority claimed that Israel was to blame, whilst also reporting Israeli statements that it was likely Palestinian terrorists shot Abu Aqla,  The Indy article also reported that Israel’s foreign minister Yair Lapid offered the Palestinians “a joint pathological investigation into the sad death of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh”.  However, Palestinians later refused Israel’s offer, and Abu Akleh was buried a few hours later.

Later in the morning, Israel’s defence minister Benny Gantz said that, while awaiting the results of their full investigation, initial findings show that IDF fire was not directed at the journalist.

Additionally, videos circulated on Twitter showing Palestinian terrorists operating in the area claiming that they had shot an Israeli soldier.  However, the fact that no soldiers were injured during the operation suggested that they may have hit Abu Akleh.  And, while it was later claimed that the Palestinians in that video weren’t in the vicinity of the journalist, other reporters provided evidence that there were other Palestinian shooters within proximity to her.

Though there is still nothing approaching conclusive evidence regarding who killed the journalist, by the time of this post there were reports that even the Palestinian Authority was backtracking on their initial claims of Israeli responsibility.

To their credit, Indy editors ultimately revised the headline, which now accurately states that ‘Israeli guilt’ is merely an Al Jazeera accusation:

Related Posts

‘Eleven Days in May’: anti-Israel propaganda at a cinema near you.

Written By
More from Adam Levick
What the Guardian won’t print: A report on Palestinian incitement during proximity talks
While the Guardian remains obsessed with a few tasteless photos taken by...
Read More
Join the Conversation


  1. says: Reginald Vernon

    Can I point out that “ no IDF fire was not directed at the journalist.” is a double negative and means the opposite of what was intended

  2. says: Grimey

    Usual Grauniad/Independent/BBC reporting tactic – Headline against Israel – Correction as late as possible afterwards – when readers have moved on. Maybe Israel should stoop to copy this level in their reporting ?

Leave a comment
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *