Simon Tisdall’s atrocious CiF piece Jan. 3 “Now it is Palestine’s turn to create facts on the ground“ (which Israelinurse dissected very effectively) produced quite a few pro-Israel comments, some of which were inexplicably deleted.
And, then:
Also:
I don’t know about you but I think the question of whether Berchmans works for the Guardian is a perfectly reasonable one.
However, at least one Guardian moderator disagreed:
At the very least, the fact that this comment was deleted does raise some eyebrows. 😉
Like this:
Like Loading...
Why were these deleted? (Does Berchmans work for the Guardian?)
Simon Tisdall’s atrocious CiF piece Jan. 3 “Now it is Palestine’s turn to create facts on the ground“ (which Israelinurse dissected very effectively) produced quite a few pro-Israel comments, some of which were inexplicably deleted.
And, then:
Also:
I don’t know about you but I think the question of whether Berchmans works for the Guardian is a perfectly reasonable one.
However, at least one Guardian moderator disagreed:
At the very least, the fact that this comment was deleted does raise some eyebrows. 😉
Like this:
Times of London corrects: deletes claim that Bibi opposed Iran talks
You may also like
Times of London reporter amplifies Hamas narrative in interview with female terrorist
Harriet Sherwood and the myth of olive oil shortages in Gaza
More on the uselessness of BBC complaints response targets