BBC ‘fake health advice’ fact checking comes to a halt in Bethlehem

Nearly four years ago the Guardian reported that:

“The BBC is to assemble a team to fact check and debunk deliberately misleading and false stories masquerading as real news.

Amid growing concern among politicians and news organisations about the impact of false information online, news chief James Harding told staff on Thursday that the BBC would be “weighing in on the battle over lies, distortions and exaggerations”.

The plans will see the corporation’s Reality Check series become permanent, backed by a dedicated team targeting false stories or facts being shared widely on social media.”

In September 2019 it was reported that:

“A group of major news publishers and tech giants has revealed plans to collaborate in the fight against fake news.

Those taking part have pledged to work together to counter disinformation that “threatens human life” or has the potential to disrupt elections.

Publishers and tech giants involved in the BBC’s anti-fake news squad include the Financial Times, Reuters, Facebook and Google.”

Since the emergence of the Coronavirus pandemic, those initiatives have included pushing back against disinformation concerning the disease itself and the vaccine.

“BBC director-general Tim Davie has warned of the “human cost” of disinformation amid conspiracy theories about coronavirus vaccines.

His comments follow a rise in false claims about the vaccines posted on social media platforms.

Davie said: “2020 has been a year like no other. We have seen the rapid spread of harmful disinformation and a growing number of conspiracy theories online.

“Whether it’s a threat to our health or a threat to our democracy, there is a human cost to disinformation.””

Earlier in the year the BBC appointed a ‘specialist disinformation reporter‘ and the BBC’s ‘Reality Check’ produced a series of videos concerning “Coronavirus: Health myths you should ignore”.

“…there’ve also been a variety of myths circulating on social media and elsewhere which amount to fake health advice. So here are a few things to ignore.”

Those things include eating garlic, drinking water every 15 minutes, drinkable silver and avoiding ice cream. Later editions included holding one’s breath, vodka, cow urine and lemon juice, with presenter Chris Morris telling BBC audiences that:

“Separating facts from fiction is really important.”

All well and good: one would indeed expect Britain’s national broadcaster to help the general public it serves to distinguish scientific fact from “fake health advice”, misinformation, disinformation and superstition.

Nevertheless, the BBC News website appeared to be rather less concerned about “separating facts from fiction” when it published a report on its ‘Middle East’ page by the BBC Jerusalem bureau’s Yolande Knell on December 19th titled ‘Faith and fertility at Bethlehem’s Milk Grotto’.

Over 35% of that article’s word-count is devoted to promotion of the notion of health-related ‘miracles’ following the consumption of limestone powder sourced from a religious site in Bethlehem. 

“It has long been believed that having a drink containing what they call “milk powder” – which is ground from the limestone – and saying a special devotion to Mary can heal health problems – especially those related to infertility.

Many Christians from Bethlehem have a story about the powers of the Milk Grotto.

After years of trying for a child, one woman finally gave birth at Christmastime after praying here with her husband. It was “the greatest gift”, she tells me.

“It happened twice with people I know well,” says tour guide Suad Sfeir. “My friend from the USA took some powder for her cousin who’d been married for 25 years and hadn’t been able to have children.

“When she came back a year later, she brought me a picture of their little baby.”

“It’s easy to dismiss the milk powder as hocus pocus,” cautions Sister Naomi as she holds up a sachet, “but it’s about faith and belief.”

And there’s plenty of that on display in a small office outside the church. Over the years, hundreds of touching letters have been sent from around the world testifying to apparent miracles.

A couple in India attach a photo of a chubby, smiling little girl. They took the milk powder after suffering two miscarriages. “Now we’re happy,” they write, simply.

“I cried a lot and my tears were my prayers,” says a French woman recounting her visit to the grotto to pray for a child. She says she became pregnant two months afterwards.

A woman in Brazil, who’d been told she was infertile, describes “a miracle called Gabriela” born after she heard about the church on a TV show and requested the powder.”

Clearly in this case the BBC was not of the opinion that “separating facts from fiction is really important” and was quite content to publish Yolande Knell’s promotion of “false health advice” relating to the consumption of limestone powder as a ‘cure’ for infertility.

At least we now know where the BBC draws the line at “fighting fake news” and “harmful disinformation”.

 

More from Hadar Sela

Thumbs up for BBC News’ Temple Mount archaeology report

On September 6th the BBC News website published its own version of...
Read More

4 Comments

  • This continued anti-semitic, anti-Israel, insidious bias from Yolande Knell is unacceptable and the role she is adopting as an employee of the BBC who purport to be independent and impartial
    is illegal and corrupt.

  • Yolande Knell should be fired, simple as, she is one of the biggest purveyors of lies, myths, and anti-Israel (read Jew-hatred) propaganda

  • How dare the BBC launch a campaign against “Fake News” when the BBC is the biggest purveyor itself of Fake News – in the form of omissions, selective interviews and bias against everything Israeli. Not once can I recall the BBC publishing a report praising the accomplishments of Israel nor its brave fight to preserve its independence.

  • Camera-UK do an excellent job of highlighting misinformation and lies about Israel.
    This article, however, is very wide of the mark. Can Camera-UK demonstrate that the stories narrated are ‘fiction’? The response here by Camera-UK is not one of fact, but of philosophy. You do not believe such miracles could occur, they are not something you have experienced, so you decide they must be wrong – but perhaps there is more to life than your experience or your philosophy.
    The history of the Jewish people is full of the miraculous – are these events to be labelled ‘fake news’ too?

Comments are closed.