Economist frames antisemitic tweets as merely ‘anti-Israel’

An Oct. 16th Economist article, “A prominent academic resigns after benefactors try to exert influence over her curriculum”, included several examples of academics whose careers were allegedly harmed due to the influence of university donors, including the following:

The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign rescinded a job offer for a professor after his public criticism of Israel’s behaviour in the 2014 Gaza conflict prompted donors’ threats to withdraw their gifts.

Though they oddly don’t name the professor, it’s clearly a reference to Steven Salaita.  However, contrary to the Economist’s claim, Salaita’s job offer wasn’t rescinded after his “criticism of Israel’s behavior”, but because of virulently antisemitic tweets, such as these:

If the author of the article wanted to argue, on academic freedom grounds, that Salaita was treated unfairly, that’s legitimate. But, to frame such racist comments as merely ‘anti-Israel’ is dishonest, and grossly misleads readers.

Related Posts

Belfast Telegraph promotes ISM lies about IDF soldiers “shooting children”

Written By
More from Adam Levick
Happy New Year, from Israel’s “Thin Green Line”
The “thin blue line”, in American discourse, typically refers to the police...
Read More
One reply on “Economist frames antisemitic tweets as merely ‘anti-Israel’”

Comments are closed.