Guardian buries the lede that ((donors)) didn’t nix Roth’s fellowship

Last week, we posted about two Guardian articles by Chris McGreal published earlier in the month reporting on the decision by Doug Elemendorf, Dean of the Harvard Kennedy School’s Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, to deny a fellowship to former Human Rights Watch (HRW) director Ken Roth.

The articles – as well as a report in the far-left magazine The Nation, which they were based on – strongly suggested, without evidence, that Jewish pro-Israel donors to the Kennedy School were to blame for Roth not being offered the position.  The claim was that Roth was being unfairly denied the position due to his group’s ‘criticism of Israel’, and that, in Roth’s words, he was the victim of “donor driven censorship”.

As Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL argued, the piece in The Nation, in particular, had strongly antisemitic undertones.

Though, we wrote in our post, it was unclear if Jewish, pro-Israel donors were the ones who convinced Elmendorm to nix the fellowship, we also stressed that Roth hasn’t been merely ‘critical of israel’, but has displayed a malign obsession with the Jewish state.  We also documented that Roth has evoked antisemitic tropes in several tweets over the years.

Late last week, Elemendorf, responding to pressure over the decision, reversed course and extended the offer to Roth, which he accepted.

The Guardian’s McGreal then published a follow-up (“Harvard reverses decision on role for Israel critic after outcry”, Jan. 19), which included this:

Roth had accused Elmendorf of withdrawing the fellowship under pressure, direct or implied, from donors who are strong supporters of Israel. The dean denied it.

“Donors do not affect our consideration of academic matters,” he said in his statement. “My decision was also not made to limit debate at the Kennedy School about human rights in any country.”

Indeed, The Chronicle of Higher Education previously reported that Ermendorf told colleagues that his original decision was based conversations he had with people who mattered to him did.  Who, specifically, asked Ken Roth, was Ermendorf referring to?

Well, Judea Pearl, whose son Daniel, a journalist for the Wall Street Journal, was kidnapped and beheaded by Islamic terrorists in Pakistan over 20 years ago, tweeted this on Jan. 19th:

In addition to being an academic who has received awards for his work on artificial intelligence, the widely respected Pearl is president of the Daniel Pearl Foundation, which works to continue his son’s life-work of East-West understanding, and is a co-recipient of the 2006 Purpose Prize for launching the Daniel Pearl Dialogue for Muslim-Jewish understanding.

So, contrary to the smears peddled about the row, it wasn’t wealthy Jewish donors who pressured Dean Elmendorf – a fact alluded to but ultimately buried due to Guardian’s insistence on never learning any lessons about the profound dangers of antisemitic dog whistles.

Related Posts

Financial Times op-ed erases Palestinian terrorism

Written By
More from Adam Levick
Guardian claims Israel threatens “Palestinian musical traditions”
A Guardian article by Bethan McKernan and Gaza-based Hazem Balousha (“‘There are...
Read More
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *