Nor has she been reluctant to advocate what’s called a “one state solution” – the radical reconstitution of the world’s only Jewish state into a majority Muslim state in which Jews would be a minority dependent on the ‘benevolence’ of the non-Jewish majority.
Karmi also believes Israel’s supporters in the U.S. exert a dangerous influence on the American political system.
Karmi, for instance, once referred to pro-Israeli advocates, for instance, as “intellectual terrorists“.
She also wrote the following at CiF about such pro-Israeli activists in the U.S:
“…People [in the U.S.] are hardened or resigned to having their freedom of expression limited by the pro-Israel lobby.”
Also, she wrote:
[Due to pressure from the Jewish lobby] Presidents…will…do anything to support Israel.
“The U.S. is not free. It is constrained by the power of the [Jewish] lobby.”
Yet, in the Guardian’s jaundiced view of what constitutes left-wing and right-wing thought, Karmi is evidently a left-leaning progressive in good standing, and her latest essay represents her 16th entry at ‘Comment is Free’ since 2002.
Her latest post, Sept. 20, represents more of the same, and is titled, ‘Palestinians need a one-state solution‘.
As it often the case with Israel haters, truth is always subservient to the greater narrative, and Karmi’s following claim is a perfect illustration.
“The colonisation process continues unabated, and to date Israel has resisted every call for a settlement based on a two-state solution.” [emphasis added]
The fiction of Israeli intransigence, in contrast to peace-loving Palestinians, represents such an extreme inversion of reality that the following must be noted:
- In 1947, the U.N. voted to partition the British Mandate of Palestine, in light of its recognition that both Jews and Arabs had legitimate claims to the land. The proposed partition included a Jewish state and an Arab state. (Jerusalem was to be an international city.) The Jewish population accepted; the Arab population refused, and responded with riots, violence and war.
- In 1967, after defending itself against another war of annihilation, the Israelis voted unanimously to return the vast majority of territories it had captured in exchange for peace. The Arab response was unequivocal: “no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it”.
- In 2000, Israel made a series of two-state proposals which eventually included almost all of the West Bank (plus additional territory from Israel proper, known as land swaps), 100% of Gaza, Palestinian control over East Jerusalem, and a $30 billion solution for the Palestinian refugees. Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat refused and immediately began planning the Al-Aqsa Intifada.
- And, in 2008, the Palestinians rejected an even more generous offer by PM Olmert of a sovereign and contiguous state (with a capital in Jerusalem).
Further, Karmi, in her CiF piece, mocks Mahmoud Abbas’ intention to seek statehood (unilaterally or otherwise), and argues for “a reassessment of Palestinian political strategy”, one which “think[s] beyond the two-state solution.”
“This situation demands a new Palestinian strategy, a Plan B that converts the Palestinian struggle for two states into one.”
The demand, of course, for the Jewish state’s dissolution – by Karmi, Ben White, Ali Abunimah, Omar Barghouti, Antony Lerman, Moussa Abu Marzouk, or other commentators whose anti-Zionist fantasies are given legitimacy on the pages of the Guardian – will never, ever be accepted by Israelis.
This is not 1937. The Peel Commission has adjourned.
The end of one-state dreams died when the nascent Jewish state miraculously emerged victorious after the Arabs launched a war of destruction in 1948.
Israeli Jews will never, ever entertain the politically regressive suggestion that they return to the status of a subjugated (or, at best, tolerated) minority, dependent on the benevolence of a historically hostile majority.
Any attempt to ‘impose’ such a solution will be met by fierce, uncompromising Jewish resistance.
While most Israelis are willing, in the event of a serious peace proposal by the Palestinians, to be extremely flexible, and make painful territorial compromises, our freedom and national sovereignty – which Jews suffered and sacrificed unimaginably over the ages to finally achieve – is simply not negotiable.
- PCC rules that Guardian’s Conal Urquhart ‘significantly misled’ readers in flotilla story (cifwatch.com)
- Harriet Sherwood scolds Romney for refusing to believe in the mythical “peaceful” Palestinians (cifwatch.com)
- The use of ‘AsAJews’ like Antony Lerman to legitimize ‘one-state solution’ proposals is shameful (cifwatch.com)
- The remarkable story of Swedish Zionist activist Annika Hernroth-Rothstein: CiF Watch Interview (cifwatch.com)
- CiF Watch ‘Style’ Guide to the Middle East for the Perplexed: A to Z (cifwatch.com)
- ‘CiF’ contributor cynically exploits Israeli man’s suicide attempt to advance political agenda (cifwatch.com)
- ‘Comment is Free’ correspondent Glenn Greenwald vs. American tolerance (cifwatch.com)