Telegraph corrects sentence suggesting that Edward Said was a ‘refugee’

Two weeks ago, we posted about a Telegraph review of a book about the late Palestinian intellectual Edward Said which included the following:

In 1951, in the wake of Israel’s expropriation of Palestinian lands, the Said family moved to the US, where Said enjoyed an Ivy League education.

First, we noted how the author, Rupert Christiansen, used a propagandistic and ahistorical euphemism to refer to the 1948 War, in which five Arab armies invaded and attempted to annihilate the nascent Jewish state.  Further, the land in question before the war was part of the British Mandate, and not “Palestinian”.

In our complaint to editors, we objected to the language about 1948, but also about the sentence’s false suggestion that Said was a refugee.

First, it wasn’t the “Said family” that moved to the US in 1951, it was just Edward Said.

And, Said moved from Cairo, the location of his family homenot, as readers would likely intuit given the context of the article, from Jerusalem.  In fact, Said’s family reportedly only stayed in Jerusalem for the first two years of his life.  He was raised in Cairo, and only moved to the US in 1951 because his father sent him to a boarding school in Massachusetts after being expelled from an elite private school in Cairo.

The 1948 War – particularly Israel’s actions during the war – played no role whatsoever in Edward Said’s move to the US, and in fact didn’t impact his family at all.

After a series of communications with Telegraph editors, they agreed to revise the sentence, which now reads:

In 1951 Said moved to the US, where he enjoyed an Ivy League education.

Related Posts
Written By
More from Adam Levick
Following CiF Watch post & reader complaints, Guardian’s Travel page adds “Israel” to the Map
As we posted here and here, the Guardian’s Travel page – which...
Read More
One reply on “Telegraph corrects sentence suggesting that Edward Said was a ‘refugee’”
  1. says: Neil C

    It is no wonder that the industry, in general, is continuing to spiral downhill, journalism is dead in the water. They even teach sensationalism in university in preference to journalism as ultimately they want to sell a product to the general public. Regrettably, the product they do serve up to the gullible general public is only fit for the sewers.

Comments are closed.